Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Masur vs Leopold Zima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Masur vs Zima analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Masur vs Leopold Zima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Masur 1 - 0 Zima
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Masur has won 50.93% of points on their second serve, while Zima has won 42.11%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Masur, in recent form, has won 51.71% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zima has won 45.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.16% and 27% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Masur has saved 64.68% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zima has saved 53.76% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Masur has won 67.12% of matches played (W/L 49/ 24), with Zima winning 52.94% (W/L 27/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Masur has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 136/ 105), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 8/ 12). Zima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 53/ 33), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 61/ 58).
- Player level: In the last year, Masur has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 74.36% of matches (W/L 29/ 10), where as Zima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.1% of matches (W/L 27/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Masur winning 1 times and Zima being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Masur winning 2 and Zima winning 0. The last match between Masur and Zima was at the M25 Nussloch, 26-01-2024, Quarterfinals, Carpet with Daniel Masur getting the victory 6-0 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:57:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Masur and Zima have played a deciding set 0 times, with Masur winning 0 times and Zima 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Masur winning 0, and Zima 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Masur has played against opponents with an average rank of 197.23 while Zima has played against players with an average rank of 129.29.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Masur has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zima has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Masur has converted 44.01% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zima has converted 39.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
301
Rank
176
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
895
Rank
774
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
58% (386-281)
Career Total W/L
56% (158-126)
76% (34-11)
YTD W/L
62% (18-11)
$151,200
Career Prize Money
$0
3
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Masur | Leopold Zima |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:57:0 | 0:57:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (22/35) | 69% (34/49) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 86% (19/22) | 53% (18/34) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 69% (9/13) | 27% (4/15) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 55% (27/49) | 20% (7/35) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-2 |
Stats 
Daniel Masur
Player
Leopold Zima
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Masur | Leopold Zima |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 76% (34/11) | 62% (18/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 71% (75/31) | 57% (38/29) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (595/454) | 51% (334/315) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 71% (5/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 50% (6/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 85% (28/5) | 70% (7/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.48 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 247 | 70 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.11 |
| DFs Total | 120 | 36 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:57 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 178.49 | 105.76 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (2081/3206) | 67% (663/986) |
| 1st Serve W% | 75% (1566/2081) | 69% (460/663) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (573/1125) | 42% (136/323) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (147/334) | 39% (28/71) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (1311/3320) | 34% (313/924) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 79% (11/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 79% (23/6) | 64% (18/10) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 76% (34/45) | 62% (18/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 59% (13/22) | 50% (4/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (9/16) | 78% (7/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (37/32) | 94% (16/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (37/5) | 6% (16/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 23% (13/3) |
Daniel Masur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Daniel Masur
74%
(
73 of
99)
1st Serve %
69%
(
79 of
115)
28
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
4
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
57 of
79)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
41 of
115)
106
Total Points Won
108
|
1-6 7-6(7) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Daniel Masur
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Oleksii Krutykh
58%
(
56 of
97)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
14
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
0
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
98
Total Points Won
91
|
6-1 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Yurii Dzhavakian
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
56%
(
59 of
106)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
10
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
49 of
106)
107
Total Points Won
94
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Timofey Skatov
Player
Daniel Masur
49%
(
41 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Lucas Gerch
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Vilius Gaubas
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Michael Geerts
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
99)
10
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Daniel Masur
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ewen Lumsden
Player
Daniel Masur
67%
(
60 of
89)
1st Serve %
76%
(
84 of
111)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
55 of
84)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
111)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Leopold Zima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Filippo Romano
Player
Leopold Zima
59%
(
16 of
27)
1st Serve %
72%
(
23 of
32)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
40
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Leopold Zima
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leopold Zima
Player
Milos Karol
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
3
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
6
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
80
|
1-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 3-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Leopold Zima
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve %
46%
(
19 of
41)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
51
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(12) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Yannik Kelm
Player
Leopold Zima
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Leopold Zima
Player
Emanuele Turconi
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
33 of
46)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Masur Vs Zima Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Masur are available here and Zima photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Leopold Zima
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
